Notes are where the argument slows down and shows its joints: extra findings, details, and clarifications that didn’t fit the narrative flow. They also credit the researchers who did the counting.
They change how a claim feels. A tidy principle becomes conditional: it works here, fails there, strengthens when paired with another cue, weakens when motives look suspect.
For anyone using these ideas, notes are training. They teach you to ask: What was manipulated? What was measured? What alternatives were ruled out? What would make the effect disappear?
That habit is protection against influence—by others and by your own enthusiasm. Once you can see the mechanism, you can also see the limits, and you stop mistaking a clever setup for a universal law.