Extreme performances tend to be followed by less extreme ones. This is not fate, punishment, or reward. It is regression to the mean.
The mind resists this because it craves causality. After a peak, the next result looks like decline that needs explanation. After a disaster, the next result looks like improvement caused by intervention.
Regression creates powerful illusions in coaching, management, and evaluation. You praise after a slump and see improvement; you scold after a peak and see decline.
The slow system can understand regression, but intuition keeps misreading it as a response to what you just did.
If you want to judge interventions, separate trend from noise. Do not let natural reversion masquerade as proof that your reward or punishment “worked.”