A frame is not decoration. It defines what counts as a gain, what counts as a loss, and what feels like the default.
Because value is reference-dependent, equivalent descriptions can produce different choices. People can prefer certainty in one frame and gamble in another, while believing they are consistent.
Frames also hide opportunity costs. When a decision is presented in isolation, the mind treats it as self-contained and ignores what else could be done with the same resources.
The fast system is easily guided by wording, labels, and salient comparisons. The slow system can correct, but only if it recognizes equivalence and actively reframes.
If you want decisions that reflect reality rather than presentation, practice translating problems across frames. When two descriptions are truly equivalent, your choice should not depend on phrasing.